Evaluation of Pulmonary Function Tests, Dyspnea Scores, and Antibody Levels at the Six-Month Follow-Up of Patients Hospitalized for COVID-19 Pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes various signs and symptoms, especially lung involvement, during acute infection and in the long term. In this study, we evaluated the follow-up results of patients with chronic COVID-19 over a 24-week period. METHODS: The study included a total of 100 post-COVID-19 patients (confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of a nasopharyngeal swab) who presented to the post-COVID-19 outpatient clinic with chronic COVID-19 symptoms 12 weeks after diagnosis, between April and June 2021. All of the patients in the study had a history of hospitalization and were grouped based on the severity of the acute COVID-19 infection (moderate: group 1, severe: group 2). RESULTS: A comparison of pulmonary function test parameters at week 12 showed that forced expiratory volume (FEV1)%, forced vital capacity (FVC)%, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO)%, and DLCO divided by the alveolar volume (DLCO/VA)% values were significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1 (p<0.001 for all). At week 24, only DLCO and DLCO/VA values were lower (<0.001 for both). The mean modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scores of groups 1 and 2 were 1.4 ± 0.9 and 2.8 ± 1.1 at 12 weeks and improved to 0.9 ± 0.6 and 1.6 ± 0.6 at 24 weeks, respectively. The groups' mMRC scores at 12 and 24 weeks differed significantly (p=0.001, p=0.02). There was no difference in levels of IgM and IgG antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein between the groups at 12 or 24 weeks (p>0.05 for all). CONCLUSION: Improvement in pulmonary function parameters and mMRC scores may take longer than 24 weeks, especially in patients with severe COVID-19. Our results indicated that the levels of IgM and IgG neutralizing antibodies did not differ between patients with moderate and severe illness at 12 or 24 weeks.

Evaluation of Hemogram Parameters in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: Immature Granulocytes and Other New Tips.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is an important cause of sudden death and is difficult to diagnose. Therefore unnecessary radiological investigations are often resorted to. Although some inflammatory parameters in the hemogram have been found to play a role in the diagnosis of PE, many parameters have not been adequately investigated. We aimed to evaluate potential inflammatory parameters in hemogram in the diagnosis of PE and to determine the parameters with the highest diagnostic value. This single-center, retrospective study was performed by evaluating 114 cases with suspected PE admitted to the emergency department between January 2017 and June 2022. Among 114 cases, 62 cases with a definitive diagnosis of PE by pulmonary computed tomography angiography served as the PE group and 52 cases without PE served as the control group. Admission hemogram parameters of both groups were recorded. Potential chronic diseases and acute conditions affecting hemogram were excluded from the study. In the multivariate model; immature granulocyte (IG), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte % and platelet large cell ratio (P-LCR) were found to be significantly and independently effective in differentiating cases with and without PE (P˂.05). Our findings suggest that high IG, high NLR, high monocyte %, and low P-LCR values have diagnostic value in cases with suspected PE. However the usability of IGs in the diagnosis of PE is a new finding. Hemogram is cheap, easily accessible, and potential inflammatory biomarkers in hemograms may increase physicians' awareness in the diagnosis of PE.

Analysis of one-year follow-up results and treatment costs of patients with PTE in a tertiary care center.

Introduction: Pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) is a life-threatening disease, with substantial treatment-related complications, difficult follow-up, treatment compliance, and high costs. This study aimed to assess treatment costs with various maintenance therapy regimens, complications, and patient adherence to treatment over a one-year follow-up period. Materials and Methods: This observational, prospective study included 142 patients with PTE who received maintenance anticoagulation therapy between November 2020 and March 2023. The patients were observed at three-month intervals for a year. Possible treatment-related complications, recurrence, mortality, and treatment costs were recorded. Result: Our results showed that there was no significant difference in bleeding risk based on the drugs used for initial or maintenance treatment. In maintenance therapy, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), warfarin, and direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) treatment regimens had similar treatment adherence and comparable efficacy and safety in terms of recurrence and bleeding (p> 0.05). Four patients (2.8%) were diagnosed with chronic thromboembolic disease. The one-year mortality rate was 24.6% (n= 35), of which 82.9% (n= 29) occurred within the first three months. Hospital mortality rates with the different maintenance therapies were 8.8% in the LMWH group, 5.7% in the warfarin group, and 3.2% in the DOAC group. The annual cost of using LMWH was higher than that of rivaroxaban, apixaban, and warfarin (p< 0.001) while there was no significant cost difference between DOACs and warfarin (p> 0.05). Conclusions: In our study, the LMWH, warfarin, and DOAC treatment regimens had similar efficacy, safety, and patient compliance. In terms of cost, LMWH was the costliest while DOAC and warfarin were similar.

COVID-19 infodemic and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic respiratory diseases: A multicentre, observational study.

Background: The explosion of information, misinformation and disinformation (the "infodemic") related to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on digital and social media is reported to affect mental health and quality of life. However, reports assessing the COVID-19 infodemic on health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients with chronic diseases are scarce. In this study, we investigated the associations between the infodemic and HRQL in uninfected individuals with pre-existing chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and other CRDs. Methods: We conducted a multi-national, cross-sectional, observational study in Canada, India, New Zealand and the United Kingdom where we distributed a set of digitised questionnaires among 1018 participants with chronic respiratory diseases who were not infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus at least three months prior to the study. We collected information about the infodemic such as news watching or social media use more than usual during the pandemic. HRQL was assessed using the short form of the chronic respiratory questionnaire (SF-CRQ). Demographic information, comorbidities, compliance, mental health, behavioural function, and social support were also recorded. We analysed the direct and indirect relationships between infodemic and HRQL using structural equation models (SEM). Results: Of all participants, 54% were females and had a mean (standard deviation (SD)) age of 53 (17) years. We found that higher infodemic was associated with worse emotional function (regression coefficient ß = -0.08; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.14 to -0.01), which means a one SD change of the higher infodemic latent variable was associated with a 0.08 SD change of emotional function level. The association between higher infodemic and worse emotional function was mediated by worse mental health and behavioural functions but is marginally ameliorated by improved social support. In stratification analysis, we found significant disease and country-wise variations in the associations between infodemic and SF-CRQ domain scores. Conclusions: These results provide new evidence that the COVID-19 infodemic significantly influences the HRQL in patients with CRDs through a complex interplay between mental health, behavioural function, and social support. This new dimension of research also opens avenues for further research on infodemic-related health effects in other chronic diseases.

Evaluation of the Relationship between FeNO and Clinical Risk Stratification for Early Mortality in Pulmonary Embolism.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common complication of deep vein thrombosis that causes high mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to determine the relationship between clinical risk scoring for early mortality and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in PE patients. METHODS: The study included a total of 98 subjects, 68 patients diagnosed with PE in the emergency department, and 30 healthy controls. Patients with PE were grouped according to clinical scoring of early mortality risk as low (n = 20), moderate-low (n = 24), and moderate-high (n = 24) risk. FeNO levels were measured after diagnosis. RESULTS: FeNO levels were significantly higher in patients with moderate-high risk PE compared to the other three groups and in those with moderate-low risk PE compared to the control group (p < 0.001 for all). Moderate to strong positive correlations were observed between FeNO level and mean pulmonary artery pressure (r = 0.818, p = 0.01), troponin-I (r = 0.67, p = 0.01), pro-BNP (r = 0.762, p = 0.01), and D-dimer levels (r = 0.652, p = 0.01). A FeNO cutoff value of 7.5 ppb had 84% sensitivity and 78% specificity in differentiating moderate-high risk PE from moderate-low risk PE. CONCLUSIONS: FeNO may be as reliable, noninvasive, and easily accessible as cardiac biomarkers in clinical risk scoring for early mortality in PE patients.

Evaluation of Exhaled Carbon Monoxide Levels in Individuals Exposed to Passive Tobacco Smoke in Indoor and Outdoor Environments: How Far Can We Getaway Under the Same Roof?

INTRODUCTION: Besides direct exposure, indirect contact with tobacco smoke significantly contributes to numerous health issues. Unfortunately, people are unaware that the precautions taken in closed environments are inadequate to deal with this issue. We conducted this study to assess carbon monoxide (CO) levels of people exposed to tobacco smoke indoors and outdoors. METHODS: Our study between May and June 2023 included individuals exposed to tobacco smoke indoors (n=100) and outdoors (n=100). Our control group included 100 people who had never been exposed to healthy tobacco smoke and agreed to participate in our research. The amount of CO exhaled was measured by observing how long people were in contact with tobacco smoke and how close they were to it. Questionnaires were asked of the study participants about the harms and awareness of tobacco smoke exposure. RESULTS: Exhaled CO levels were 1.46 ± 0.1 ppm in people exposed to tobacco smoke indoors, 1.1± 0.03 ppm in people exposed to smoke outside, and 1.1± 0.02 ppm in the control group. The statistical analysis revealed that individuals exposed to tobacco smoke in the indoor environment had significantly higher exhaled CO levels than those in the outdoor and the control groups (p=0.006). In the correlation analysis of time and distance in the indoor environment with the exhaled CO level, there was no statistically significant difference between time and space (r= -0.168, p=0.09, r=0.09, p=0.37, respectively). While less than half of both groups were aware of second-hand tobacco smoke, individuals exposed to tobacco smoke in the outdoor environment were more familiar (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite the precautions, indoor tobacco smoke exposure is severe because of second- and third-hand smoke. Raising individual awareness and enhancing the steps should be our top concern to prevent future health problems.

The role of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) in the differential diagnosis of granulomatous and reactive LAP diagnosed by endobronchial ultrasonography.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Tuberculosis and sarcoidosis are the two most important granulomatous diseases that physicians have difficulty in differential diagnosis. In our study, we aimed to observe the place of systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) level in the differentiation of patients diagnosed with endoboronchial ultrasonography (EBUS). METHODS: Our study included 494 patients who applied to our hospital's chest diseases outpatient clinic between 2015 and 2020 and underwent endobronchial ultrasonography (EBUS) for mediastinal lymphadenopathy (LAP). Patients' follow-up for at least 2 years after diagnosis and pre-procedural hematologic parameters were retrospectively recorded. RESULTS: In the comparison of SII between groups, it was observed that SII was statistically significantly higher in patients followed up for tuberculous lymphadenitis compared to patients with sarcoidosis and reactive LAP (p=0.01, <0.001). In sarcoidosis patients, SII levels were statistically significantly higher than in patients with reactive LAP (p=0.002). Platelet, sedimentation and SII levels were statistically significantly higher in stage 2 patients compared to stage 1 patients, while lymphocyte levels were lower (p=0.009, 0.001, 0.001, 0.001, 0.001 respectively). In the ROC curve analysis of the SII level of patients with sarcoidosis and tuberculosis LAP, the AUC was 0.668 and when the cut-off value for the SII level was 890.667, the sensitivity was 70% and the specificity was 66% in the differentiation of tuberculosis and sarcoidosis lymphadenitis. CONCLUSION: SII may be an easily applicable parameter in the differentiation of tuberculosis and sarcoidosis LAP with granuloma and in the differentiation of granulomatous diseases from reactive LAP.

Effect of atmospheric pressure changes on the development of pulmonary embolism: a retrospective analysis of 8 years of data.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a condition with high mortality, and determining its etiology is as important as its treatment. There are limited studies in the literature examining the effect of atmospheric pressure (AP) change on PE. OBJECTIVES: Analyze the effect of AP level and the change in AP level on the development of PE according to year, season and months. DESIGN: Retrospective SETTING: Department of tertiary care center PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with diagnosed or presumed PE who were followed up in the Erzurum Atatürk University Medicine Chest Diseases Clinic between 2012 and 2020 (8 years) were retrospectively screened for inclusion in the study by examining hospital records. Daily AP values were obtained electronically through official correspondence with the Erzurum Regional Meteorological Directorate. Patients diagnosed with PE were recorded using the hospital database and anamnesis forms. The dates of admission to hospital were recorded. Risk factors leading to the development of PE were identified using the records. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relationship between AP values and the incidence of PE. SAMPLE SIZE: 592 RESULTS: APmin, APmax, and APmean were significantly lower on days with PE cases compared to days without PE cases (P<.001 for all). ΔAPmin, ΔAPmax, and ΔAPmean values were all negative on days with PE, but only the difference in ΔAPmin was significant (P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that lower AP values were significantly associated with the incidence of PE. In particular, a drop in APmin compared to the previous day seemed to be most associated with PE development. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective design and only applicable to region. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None.

Evaluation of the value of exhaled carbon monoxide in the differentiation of viral and bacterial pneumonia.

Aim: This study compared exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) levels in patients hospitalized for bacterial and COVID-19-related viral community-acquired pneumonia. Materials & methods: The study included a total of 150 patients: 50 patients hospitalized for COVID-19 between February 2021 and March 2022, 50 patients with bacterial community-acquired pneumonia and 50 healthy controls. Results: In comparisons of exhaled CO levels among the groups, there was no significant difference between patients with bacterial pneumonia and controls, whereas patients with COVID-19 pneumonia had significantly higher exhaled CO levels compared with both the bacterial pneumonia and control groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Viral agents can directly affect the heme oxygenase system of the lower respiratory tract, leading to greater increases in ferritin and exhaled CO levels compared with bacterial pneumonia.

Infections in the lung tissue cause stress in the body. Several mechanisms are activated in the body to balance this stress. The heme oxygenase system plays a role in suppressing inflammation, and its overactivation can cause an increase in the amount of carbon monoxide (CO) we exhale. This study examined exhaled CO levels in patients with bacterial lung infection and COVID-19 viral lung infection in comparison with the healthy population. We found that patients with COVID-19 lung infection had higher levels of CO in their breath than patients with bacterial lung infection and healthy control subjects. These findings suggest that measurements of exhaled CO levels in people with signs and symptoms of lung infection might be used to differentiate patients with viral and bacterial lung infections.

Comparison of two antifibrotic treatments for lung fibrosis in post-COVID-19 syndrome: A randomized, prospective study.

Background: Although pulmonary fibrosis secondary to COVID-19 infection is uncommon, it can lead to problems if not treated effectively in the early period. This study aimed to compare the effects of treatment with nintedanib and pirfenidone in patients with COVID-19-related fibrosis. Methods: Thirty patients who presented to the post-COVID outpatient clinic between May 2021 and April 2022 with a history of COVID-19 pneumonia and exhibited persistent cough, dyspnea, exertional dyspnea, and low oxygen saturation at least 12 weeks after diagnosis were included. The patients were randomized to receive off-label treatment with nintedanib or pirfenidone and were followed up for 12 weeks. Results: After 12 weeks of treatment, all pulmonary function test (PFT) parameters, 6MWT distance, and oxygen saturation were increased compared to baseline in both the pirfenidone group and nintedanib groups, while heart rate and radiological score levels were decreased (p < 0.05 for all). The changes in 6MWT distance and oxygen saturation were significantly greater in the nintedanib group than in the pirfenidone group (p = 0.02 and 0.005, respectively). Adverse drug effects were more frequent with nintedanib than pirfenidone, with the most common being diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. Conclusion: In patients with interstitial fibrosis after COVID-19 pneumonia, both nintedanib and pirfenidone were observed to be effective in improving radiological score and PFT parameters. Nintedanib was more effective than pirfenidone in increasing exercise capacity and saturation values but caused more adverse drug effects.

Introducción: Aunque la fibrosis pulmonar secundaria a la infección por COVID-19 es poco común, puede generar problemas si no se trata de manera efectiva en el período inicial. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo comparar los efectos del tratamiento con nintedanib y pirfenidona en pacientes con fibrosis relacionada con COVID-19. Métodos: Se incluyeron 30 pacientes que acudieron a la consulta externa post-COVID entre mayo de 2021 y abril de 2022 con antecedentes de neumonía por COVID-19 y presentaron tos persistente, disnea, disnea de esfuerzo y baja saturación de oxígeno al menos 12 semanas después del diagnóstico. Los pacientes fueron aleatorizados para recibir un tratamiento no aprobado con nintedanib o pirfenidona y fueron seguidos durante 12 semanas. Resultados: Después de 12 semanas de tratamiento, todos los parámetros de la prueba de función pulmonar (PFT), la distancia de la PM6M y la saturación de oxígeno aumentaron en comparación con los valores basales tanto en el grupo de pirfenidona como en el de nintedanib, mientras que la frecuencia cardíaca y los niveles de puntuación radiológica disminuyeron (p < 0,05 para todos). Los cambios en la distancia de la PM6M y la saturación de oxígeno fueron significativamente mayores en el grupo de nintedanib que en el grupo de pirfenidona (p = 0,02 y p = 0,005, respectivamente). Los efectos adversos del fármaco fueron más frecuentes con nintedanib que con pirfenidona, siendo los más comunes diarrea, náuseas y vómitos. Conclusión: En pacientes con fibrosis intersticial después de neumonía por COVID-19 se observó que tanto nintedanib como pirfenidona son efectivos para mejorar la puntuación radiológica y los parámetros de la PFT. Nintedanib fue más eficaz que pirfenidona para aumentar la capacidad de ejercicio y los valores de saturación, pero provocó más efectos adversos del fármaco.

Evaluation of the role of serum DcR3 levels in the early clinical prognosis of patients with Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever.

BACKGROUND: Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is a zoonotic disease that is transmitted by Hyalomma ticks and is endemic in many parts of the world. This study aimed to determine the relationship between early serum Decoy receptor-3 (DcR3) level and clinical severity in patients with CCHF. METHODS: The study included 88 patients hospitalized for CCHF between April and August 2022 and a control group of 40 healthy individuals. The patients were divided according to clinical course as those with mild/moderate (group 1, n = 55) and severe (group 2, n = 33) CCHF. DcR3 levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of serum obtained at the time of diagnosis. RESULTS: Fever, hemorrhage, nausea, headache, diarrhea, and hypoxia were significantly more common among patients with severe CCHF than patients with mild/moderate CCHF (p < 0.001, <0.001, 0.02, 0.01, <0.001, and < 0.001, respectively). Group 2 had higher serum DcR3 levels than both group 1 and the control group (p < 0.001 for both). Serum DcR3 levels were also significantly higher in group 1 than in the control group (p < 0.001). Using 98.4 ng/mL as the cut-off value, serum DcR3 had 99% sensitivity and 88% specificity in differentiating patients with severe CCHF from those with mild/moderate CCHF. CONCLUSION: During the high season in our endemic region, CCHF can present with a severe clinical course independent of age and comorbidities, unlike other infectious diseases. Elevated DcR3 observed early in the disease may allow additional immunomodulatory therapies to be tried in addition to antiviral therapy in CCHF, for which treatment options are limited.

Can Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FeNO) Serve as a Clinical Indicator for Patients Hospitalized with Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever?

Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF), a zoonotic disease spread by infected viruses, can be a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in endemic areas. This prospective study aimed to establish the relationship between fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels and clinical prognosis of CCHF. The study included 85 participants: 55 patients followed up for CCHF from May to August 2022, and 30 healthy controls. FeNO levels were measured upon hospital admission and were 7.6 ± 3.3 parts per billion (ppb) in patients with mild/moderate CCHF, 2.5 ± 2.1 ppb in patients with severe CCHF, and 6.7 ± 1.7 ppb in the healthy control group. There was no statistically significant difference in FeNO levels between the control group and patients with mild/moderate CCHF (P = 0.09), whereas patients with severe CCHF had lower FeNO levels than those in the control group and patients with mild/moderate CCHF (P < 0.001 for both). FeNO measurement may offer a noninvasive and easily applied approach for predicting the clinical course and prognosis of CCHF in the early stages of the disease.

Less Social Deprivation Is Associated With Better Health-Related Quality of Life in Asthma and Is Mediated by Less Anxiety and Better Sleep Quality.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in asthma have mainly focused on clinical and environmental determinants. Little is known about the role of social determinants on HRQoL in asthma. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the association between social deprivation and HRQoL in asthma. METHODS: A total of 691 adult asthmatics from Canada, India, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom were administered a digital questionnaire containing demographic information and questions about social and psychological attributes, sleep disturbances, and alcohol abuse. HRQoL was measured using the Short Form of the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (SF-CRQ). We analyzed the direct and indirect relationships between social deprivation and HRQoL using structural equation models with social deprivation as a latent variable. We tested for mediation via anxiety, depression, sleep disturbances, and alcohol abuse. RESULTS: We found that less social deprivation (latent variable) was directly associated with better SF-CRQ domain scores such as dyspnea (regression coefficient ß: 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07 to 0.58), fatigue (ß: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.64), and emotional function (ß: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.62), but with the worse mastery score (ß: -0.29; 95% CI: -0.55 to -0.03); however, those associations varied across participating countries. We also observed that among all individual social deprivation indicators, education, companionship, emotional support, instrumental support, and social isolation were directly associated with HRQoL, and the relationship between social deprivation and HRQoL was mediated through anxiety and sleep disturbances. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that less social deprivation was directly, and indirectly through less anxiety and better sleep quality, associated with better HRQoL in asthma.

Comparison of two antifibrotic treatments for lung fibrosis in post-COVID-19 syndrome: A randomized, prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Although pulmonary fibrosis secondary to COVID-19 infection is uncommon, it can lead to problems if not treated effectively in the early period. This study aimed to compare the effects of treatment with nintedanib and pirfenidone in patients with COVID-19-related fibrosis. METHODS: Thirty patients who presented to the post-COVID outpatient clinic between May 2021 and April 2022 with a history of COVID-19 pneumonia and exhibited persistent cough, dyspnea, exertional dyspnea, and low oxygen saturation at least 12 weeks after diagnosis were included. The patients were randomized to receive off-label treatment with nintedanib or pirfenidone and were followed up for 12 weeks. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, all pulmonary function test (PFT) parameters, 6MWT distance, and oxygen saturation were increased compared to baseline in both the pirfenidone group and nintedanib groups, while heart rate and radiological score levels were decreased (p<0.05 for all). The changes in 6MWT distance and oxygen saturation were significantly greater in the nintedanib group than in the pirfenidone group (p=0.02 and 0.005, respectively). Adverse drug effects were more frequent with nintedanib than pirfenidone, with the most common being diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. CONCLUSION: In patients with interstitial fibrosis after COVID-19 pneumonia, both nintedanib and pirfenidone were observed to be effective in improving radiological score and PFT parameters. Nintedanib was more effective than pirfenidone in increasing exercise capacity and saturation values but caused more adverse drug effects.

Use of the PaO2/FiO2 Ratio in Pulmonary Embolism: Evaluation of its Correlation with Pulmonary Arterial Computed Tomography Obstruction Index.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The pulmonary arterial computed tomography obstruction index ratio (PACTOIR) is a parameter that provides an idea of the clinical severity of acute pulmonary embolism (APE). This study aimed to examine the correlation between the PaO2 /FiO2 ratio and PACTOIR in patients who presented to the emergency department and received a preliminary diagnosis of APE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted prospectively in the emergency department. The patients' sociodemographic characteristics, vital signs, PACTOIR, and PaO2 /FiO2 ratio were obtained. The correlation between PACTOIR and PaO2 /FiO2 ratio was then statistically evaluated. RESULTS: The study included 50 patients, of whom 31 (62%) were women, and 19(38%) were men. The female patients had a PaO2 /FiO2 ratio of 209 ± 67 and PACTOIR of 36.3 ± 15.5. The male patients had a PaO2 /FiO2 ratio of 169 ± 43 and PACTOIR of 39.7 ± 19. The PaO2 /FiO2 ratio of the patients with APE was negatively correlated with the PACTOIR value at a statistically significant level (r = -0.308, p = 0.031). The regression equation was as follows: PACTOIR = (-0.0869) x (PaO2 / FiO2) + (54.489). CONCLUSION: By calculating the PaO2 /FiO2 ratio in patients with APE, the degree of pulmonary artery obstruction and clinical severity can be predicted. Therefore, the ratio PaO2 /FiO2 can be used instead of PACTOIR.

Evaluation of the Relationship between Exhaled CO Levels with Clinical Course and Parenchymal Involvement in COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus, has infected nearly 270 million people over the past two years. We aimed to determine the exhaled CO levels of patients hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia and its correlation with parenchymal involvement. METHODS: Between September 2021 and December 2021, 74 patients who were hospitalized in the infectious diseases service of our hospital and whose delta variant COVID-19 infection was confirmed with real-time PCR method were included in the study. The patients were analyzed in 3 groups: moderate COVID-19 (group 1), severe COVID-19 without macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) (group 2), and severe COVID-19 with MAS (group 3). RESULTS: While it was observed that the exhaled CO levels were higher in patients in Group 3 at the time of hospitalization than in patients in Group 1 and 2, it was determined that no significant difference was observed between the groups at the time of discharge (p < 0.001, 0.213). CT scores obtained at the time of hospitalization were also observed to be statistically significantly higher in patients in Group 3 when compared to patients in Group 1 and 2 (p = 0.002). In the correlation analysis of the exhaled CO levels and the CT scores at the time of hospitalization, a statistically significant positive correlation was observed (r = 0.628, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In COVID-19, which has a high affinity for lung tissue compared to other known viral lower respiratory tract infections, the exhaled CO level may be a non-invasive parameter that can be used in the evaluation of parenchymal involvement and clinical course.

The association of antiviral drugs with COVID-19 morbidity: The retrospective analysis of a nationwide COVID-19 cohort.

Background and objectives: Although several repurposed antiviral drugs have been used for the treatment of COVID-19, only a few such as remdesivir and molnupiravir have shown promising effects. The objectives of our study were to investigate the association of repurposed antiviral drugs with COVID-19 morbidity. Methods: Patients admitted to 26 different hospitals located in 16 different provinces between March 11-July 18, 2020, were enrolled. Case definition was based on WHO criteria. Patients were managed according to the guidelines by Scientific Board of Ministry of Health of Turkey. Primary outcomes were length of hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) requirement, and intubation. Results: We retrospectively evaluated 1,472 COVID-19 adult patients; 57.1% were men (mean age = 51.9 ± 17.7years). A total of 210 (14.3%) had severe pneumonia, 115 (7.8%) were admitted to ICUs, and 69 (4.7%) were intubated during hospitalization. The median (interquartile range) of duration of hospitalization, including ICU admission, was 7 (5-12) days. Favipiravir (n = 328), lopinavir/ritonavir (n = 55), and oseltamivir (n = 761) were administered as antiviral agents, and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ, n = 1,382) and azithromycin (n = 738) were used for their immunomodulatory activity. Lopinavir/ritonavir (ß [95% CI]: 4.71 [2.31-7.11]; p = 0.001), favipiravir (ß [95% CI]: 3.55 [2.56-4.55]; p = 0.001) and HCQ (ß [95% CI]: 0.84 [0.02-1.67]; p = 0.046) were associated with increased risk of lengthy hospital stays. Furthermore, favipiravir was associated with increased risks of ICU admission (OR [95% CI]: 3.02 [1.70-5.35]; p = 0.001) and invasive mechanical ventilation requirement (OR [95% CI]: 2.94 [1.28-6.75]; p = 0.011). Conclusion: Our findings demonstrated that antiviral drugs including lopinavir, ritonavir, and favipiravir were associated with negative clinical outcomes such as increased risks for lengthy hospital stay, ICU admission, and invasive mechanical ventilation requirement. Therefore, repurposing such agents without proven clinical evidence might not be the best approach for COVID-19 treatment.